ISSN Print: 2472-9450  ISSN Online: 2472-9469
International Journal of Psychology and Cognitive Science  
Manuscript Information
 
 
Job Satisfaction Among Non-Academic Staff of Malaysian Private Universities in Selangor and Klang Valley
International Journal of Psychology and Cognitive Science
Vol.5 , No. 2, Publication Date: May 28, 2019, Page: 95-103
1196 Views Since May 28, 2019, 549 Downloads Since May 28, 2019
 
 
Authors
 
[1]    

Yazid Hezam Mohammed Al-Hanhanah, Faculty of Business Management and Globalization, Limkokwing University of Creative Technology, Cyberjaya, Malaysia.

[2]    

Abdulrahman Ali Mohsen Al-Harethi, Department of Project Management, Limkokwing University of Creative Technology, Cyberjaya, Malaysia.

 
Abstract
 

This research study covers the application of Herzberg’s Tow-Factory Theory to determine the influence of the motivational intrinsic factors on job satisfaction among the non-academic staff of the selected private universities. The study aims to identify the level of relationship between each of the four motivational factors (meaningful work, recognition for accomplishment, the opportunity for growth, and nature of work) and job satisfaction among the non-academic staff of private universities in Selangor and Klang Valley. The targeted population for this research is the non-academic staff in the selected five Malaysian private universities, from which a sample of 250 survey respondents was selected. A quantitative study is employed for this research. In this research, descriptive analysis is employed to find the descriptive information of respondents and to find the mean score values of the research variables. In addition, a reliability test is conducted to examine the reliability of the variables. Pearson correlation and regression analysis are also conducted to find the relationship between these variables and the variance of such relationship, along with the respective effect of the independent predictor variables on the dependent variable through testing the research hypotheses. The findings reveal that four hypotheses are accepted. The highest predictor variable of job satisfaction is the opportunity for growth, followed by the nature of work, meaningful work and recognition for accomplishment respectively. Based on these findings, the decision makers as regards to these universities are recommended to enhance job satisfaction among the non-academic employees in the universities by following the recommendations stated at the end of this study.


Keywords
 

"Job Satisfaction, Non-academic Staff, Meaningful Work, Recognition for Accomplishment, Opportunities for Growth, Nature of Work, Malaysian Private Universities "


Reference
 
[01]    

Nazeer, S. Zahid, M. M. and Azeem, M. F. 2014. Internal service quality and job performance: does job satisfaction mediate. Journal of Human Resources, 2 (1), pp. 41-65.

[02]    

Almutairi, D. O. Moradi, E. Idrus, D. Emami, R. and Alanazi, T. R. 2013. Job satisfaction and job performance: A case study of five-star hotels in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. World, 3 (1).

[03]    

Nadiri, H. and Tanova, C. 2010. An investigation of the role of justice in turnover intentions, job satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behavior in hospitality industry. International journal of hospitality management, 29 (1), pp. 33-41.

[04]    

Arif, A. and Chohan, A. 2012. How job Satisfaction is influencing the organizational citizenship behavior (OCB): A study on employees working in banking sector of Pakistan. Interdisciplinary journal of contemporary research in business, 4 (8), pp. 74-88.

[05]    

Samuel, E. Oladipo, Uchenna, C. Onuoha, 2013. Age, Gender and Marital Status as Factors of Job Satisfaction among Print-Media Workers. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 3 (5), 126-130.

[06]    

Avram, E. Ionescu, D. and Mincu, C. L. 2015. Perceived safety climate and organizational trust: the mediator role of job satisfaction. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 187, pp. 679-684.

[07]    

Aslan, A. S. Shaukat, M. Z. Ahmed, I. Shah, I. M. and Mahfar, M. 2014. Job satisfactions of academics in Malaysian public universities. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 114, pp. 154-158.

[08]    

Munir, R. I. S. Rahman, R. A. Malik, A. M. A. and Ma’amor, H. 2012. Relationship between transformational leadership and employees’ job satisfaction among the academic staff. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 65, pp. 885-890.

[09]    

Aydin, A. Uysal, S. and Sarier, Y. 2012. The effect of gender on job satisfaction of teachers: A meta-analysis study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, pp. 356-362.

[10]    

Μονιάρου-Παπακωνσταντίνου, Β. Τριανταφύλλου, Κ. Moniarou-Papaconstantinou, V. and Triantafyllou, K. 2015. Job satisfaction and work values: Investigating sources of job satisfaction with respect to information professionals.

[11]    

Smerek, R. E. and Peterson, M. 2007. Examining Herzberg’s theory: Improving job satisfaction among non-academic employees at a university. Research in Higher Education, 48 (2), pp. 229-250.

[12]    

Engleza, R. 2007. Job Satisfaction, 24 Englezahtt, Retrieved March 13, 2010, from. www. e-referate. ro/referate/Job_satisfaction_-_essay2007-10-24. html.

[13]    

Osakwe, R. N. 2014. Factors Affecting Motivation and Job Satisfaction of Academic Staff of Universities in South-South Geopolitical Zone of Nigeria. International Education Studies, 7 (7), pp. 43-51.

[14]    

Voisard, V. O. 2009. Employee empowerment and employee satisfaction in the workplace (Doctoral dissertation, California State University, Los Angeles).

[15]    

SUNDAR, D. and Kumar, A. 2012. Demographic Factors and Job Satisfaction of Employees in Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC)-Vellore Division. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing & Management Review, 1 (3).

[16]    

Tella, A. Ayeni, C. O. and Popoola, S. O. 2007. Work motivation, job satisfaction, and organisational commitment of library personnel in academic and research libraries in Oyo State, Nigeria. Library philosophy and practice.

[17]    

Herzberg, F. Mausnes, B. Peterson, R. O. and Capwell, D. F. 1957. Job attitudes; review of research and opinion.

[18]    

Herzberg, F. M. and Mausner, B. 1959. B. & Snyderman, B. (1959). The motivation to work, 2, pp. 49-58.

[19]    

Herzberg, F. 1968. One more time: How do you motivate employees?

[20]    

Arnold, K. A. Turner, N. Barling, J. Kelloway, E. K. and McKee, M. C. 2007. Transformational leadership and psychological well-being: the mediating role of meaningful work. Journal of occupational health psychology, 12 (3), p. 193.

[21]    

Littman-Ovadia, H. and Steger, M. 2010. Character strengths and well-being among volunteers and employees: Toward an integrative model. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5 (6), pp. 419-430.

[22]    

Steger, M. F. Dik, B. J. and Duffy, R. D. 2012. Measuring meaningful work: The work and meaning inventory (WAMI). Journal of Career Assessment, 20 (3), pp. 322-337.

[23]    

Harpaz, I. and Fu, X. 2002. The structure of the meaning of work: A relative stability amidst change. Human relations, 55 (6), pp. 639-667.

[24]    

Rosso, B. D. Dekas, K. H. and Wrzesniewski, A. 2010. On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in organizational behavior, 30, pp. 91-127.

[25]    

Herzberg, F. I. 1966. Work and the nature of man.

[26]    

Ongori, H. and Agolla, J. E. 2009. Paradigm shift in managing career plateau in organisation: The best strategy to minimize employee intention to quit. African journal of business management, 3 (6), pp. 268-271.

[27]    

Freed, D. E. 2003. Material benefits, advancement, or fulfillment: A study into the causes and predictors of job satisfaction based on how people view their work. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 8 (4), p. 116.

[28]    

Krejcie, R. V. and Morgan, D. W. 1970. Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement, 30 (3), pp. 607-610.

[29]    

Carifio, J. and Perla, R. J. 2007. Ten common misunderstandings, misconceptions, persistent myths and urban legends about Likert scales and Likert response formats and their antidotes. Journal of Social Sciences, 3 (3), pp. 106-116.





 
  Join Us
 
  Join as Reviewer
 
  Join Editorial Board
 
share:
 
 
Submission
 
 
Membership