ISSN Print: 2472-9450  ISSN Online: 2472-9469
International Journal of Psychology and Cognitive Science  
Manuscript Information
 
 
Disciplinary Alternative Education Program Placement Inequities by the Economic Status of Texas Grade 6, 7, and 8 Students: A Multiyear, Statewide Investigation
International Journal of Psychology and Cognitive Science
Vol.3 , No. 5, Publication Date: Dec. 6, 2017, Page: 59-71
335 Views Since December 6, 2017, 155 Downloads Since Dec. 6, 2017
 
 
Authors
 
[1]    

Edward Lopez, Montgomery Independent School District, Montgomery, USA.

[2]    

John R. Slate, Department of Educational Leadership, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, USA.

[3]    

Cynthia Martinez-Garcia, Department of Educational Leadership, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, USA.

[4]    

George Moore, Department of Educational Leadership, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, USA.

 
Abstract
 

In this investigation, the extent to which inequities in Disciplinary Alternative Education Program placements were present by economic status (i.e., Not Poor, Moderately Poor, or Extremely Poor) for Grade 6, 7, and 8 White, Hispanic, and Black students was ascertained. Archival statewide data were analyzed from a Public Information Request form that was fulfilled from the Texas Education Agency Public Education Information Management System on all middle school students for the 2012-2013, 2013-2014, 2014-2015, and 2015-2016 school years. Inferential statistical analyses revealed statistically significant differences in all four school years. A stair-step effect was present for each year and at each grade level. Grade 6, 7, and 8 White, Hispanic, and Black students who were Extremely Poor received statistically significantly higher rates of Disciplinary Alternative Education Program placements than their peers who were Moderately Poor and their peers who were Not Poor. Grade 6, 7, and 8 White, Hispanic, and Black students who were Moderately Poor had statistically significantly higher rates of Disciplinary Alternative Education Program placements than their peers who were Not Poor. Recommendations for research are provided, as well as implications for policy and practice.


Keywords
 

Disciplinary Alternative Education Program, Middle School Students, Economic Status


Reference
 
[01]    

Curtiss, K., & Slate, J. R. (2015). Differences in disciplinary consequences and reasons for Texas elementary students by gender. Poster presented at the Hawaii International Conference on Education, Honolulu, HI.

[02]    

National Association of Secondary School Principals. (2000) Statement on Civil Rights Implications of Zero Tolerance Programs. Testimony presented to the United States Commission on Civil Rights, Washington, DC.

[03]    

Butler, B., Lewis, C., Moore, J., & Scott, M. (2012). Assessing the odds: Disproportional discipline practices and implications for educational stakeholders. The Journal of Negro Education, 81, 11-24.

[04]    

Barnes, M. J., & Slate, J. R. (2016). Grade 4 and 5 inequities in disciplinary consequences by ethnicity/race and gender. Journal of Global Research in Education and Social Science, 5, 216-221. Retrieved from http://www.ikpress.org/issue633

[05]    

Lopez, E., & Slate, J. R. (2016). Differences in disciplinary alternative educational placement as a function of economic status for White students. Journal of Global Research in Education and Social Sciences, 6 (2), 75-79.

[06]    

Texas Education Agency. (2014a). Recoded Economic Status, Recoded Disciplinary Consequence Assigned Crosstabulation. Retrieved from http://tea.texas.gov/Reports_and_Data/Data_Submission/PEIMS/PEIMS_Data_Standards/PEIMS_Data_Standards/

[07]    

Texas Education Agency. (2014b). Recoded Economic Status, Recoded Reason for Discipline Consequence. Retrieved from http://tea.texas.gov/Reports_and_Data/Data_Submission/PEIMS/PEIMS_Data_Standards/PEIMS_Data_Standards/

[08]    

Khan, M. Q., & Slate, J. R. (2016). Disciplinary consequence differences in Grade 6 students as a function of race/ethnicity and economic status. Journal of School Administration Research and Development, 1, 39-46.

[09]    

Gregory, A., Skiba, R. J., & Noguera P. A. (2010). The achievement gap and the discipline gap: Two sides of the same coin? Educational Researcher, 39 (1), 59-68. doi: 10.3102/0013189X09357621.

[10]    

Harlow, C. W. (2003). Education and correctional population. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from http//www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=814

[11]    

Chapman, C., Laird, J., Ifill, N., & Kewal Ramani, A. (2011). Trends in High School Dropout and Completion Rates in the United States: 1972-2009 (NCES 2012-006). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch

[12]    

Carrell, S. E., & Hoekstra, M. L. (2010). Externalities in the classroom: How children exposed to domestic violence affect everyone’s kids. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2 (1), 211-228.

[13]    

Hilberth, M. R. (2010). Black and White Texas middle school student discipline referral consequences and their relationship to academic achievement (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest. (UMI 3448047).

[14]    

Hilberth, M. R., & Slate, J. R. (2014). Middle school Black and White student assignment to disciplinary consequences: A clear lack of equity. Education & Urban Society, 46, 312-328. doi: 10.1177/0013124512446218.

[15]    

Jones, M. C. (2013). White and Hispanic Texas middle school student’ discipline consequence type and academic achievement: A statewide analysis (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Full Text. (UMI No 3571403).

[16]    

Skiba, R. J., & Peterson, R. (2000). School discipline at a crossroads: From zero tolerance to early response. Exceptional Children, 66 (3), 335-345.

[17]    

Wallace, J. M., Jr., Goodkind, S., Wallace, C. M., & Bachman, J. G. (2008). Racial, ethnic, and gender differences in school discipline among U.S. school students: 1991-2005. The Negro Educational Review, 59, 47-62.

[18]    

Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2012). Educational research. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

[19]    

Burney, V. H., & Beilke, J. R. (2008). The constraints of poverty on high achievement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 31, 171-197.

[20]    

Maughan, S. (1999). Policy and implementation of the juvenile justice alternative programs throughout the state of Texas. Journal of Correctional Education, 50, 124-129.

[21]    

Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

[22]    

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

[23]    

Carpenter, D., Ramirez, A., & Severn, L. (2006). Gap or gaps—Challenging the singular definition of the achievement gap. Education and Urban Society, 39 (1), 113-127. doi: 10.1177/0013124506291792.





 
  Join Us
 
  Join as Reviewer
 
  Join Editorial Board
 
share:
 
 
Submission
 
 
Membership