Indexing
All Issues
Submission
Author Guidelines
Reviewers
Editorial Members
Publication Fee
Vol.1 , No. 1, Publication Date: Mar. 28, 2015, Page: 11-18
. In the article are examined the conversions of electromagnetic fields on upon transfer of one inertial system to another, obtained on the basis of the equations of electromagnetic and magnetoelectric induction with the use by the substantional derivative and they are examined the consequences, which escape from such conversions.&picture=http://www.aascit.org/aascit/decorators/img/journal/977.jpg)
| [1] | F. F. Mende, B. I. Verkin Institute for Low Temperature Physics and Engineering NAS, Ukraine. |
The laws of classical electrodynamics they reflect experimental facts they are phenomenological. Unfortunately, contemporary classical electrodynamics is not deprived of the contradictions, which did not up to now obtain their explanation. The fundamental equations of contemporary classical electrodynamics are Maksvell's equation. But not all know that those equations, which it is customary to assume as Maxwell's equations, not are those equations, which used itself Maxwell. During writing of its equations it used the substantional derivative, that are made themselves they invariant with respect to the conversions of Galileo. Subsequently Hertz and Heaviside excluded from the substantional derivative its convective part, after writing down Maxwell's equations in the partial derivatives. In this form the equations are invariant to the conversions of Lorenz and this approach laid way to the creation of the special theory of relativity (SR). In the article are examined the conversions of electromagnetic fields on upon transfer of one inertial system to another, obtained on the basis of the equations of electromagnetic and magnetoelectric induction with the use by the substantional derivative and they are examined the consequences, which escape from such conversions.
Keywords
Maxwell's Equation, Lorenz's Conversions, Substantional Derivative, Electromagnetic Induction, Magnetoelectric Induction
Reference
| [01] | James Clerk Maxwell. Selected works on the theory of the electric field, the State publishing technical and theoretical literature, Moscow, 1954. |
| [02] | Heinrich Hertz. Electric force, St. Petersburg, 1894. |
| [03] | Heaviside. O. Electrical Papers. London, 1892. |
| [04] | Ampere A.- M. Electrodynamics, USSR Academy of Sciences Publishing House, 1954. |
| [05] | Feynman R., Leighton R., Sends M., Feynman lectures on physics, – М..Mir, Vol. 6,1977. |
| [06] | Rashevskii P. K. Riemann geometry and tensor analysis. M .: Nauka, 1967. |
| [07] | Mende F. F. On refinement of equations of electromagnetic induction, – Kharkov, deposited in VINITI, No 774 – B88 Dep.,1988. |
| [08] | Mende F. F. Experimental corroboration and theoretical interpretation of dependence of charge value on DC flow velocity through superconductors. |
| [09] | Proceedings International Conference “Physics in Ukraine”, Kiev, 1993. |
| [10] | Mende F. F. Are there errors in modern physics. Kharkov, Constant, 2003. |
| [11] | Mende F. F. Consistent electrodynamics and the threat of nuclear Space terrorism. Kharkov NTMT, 2008. |
| [12] | W.F. Edwards, C.S. Kenyon, D.K. Lemon, Continuing investigation into possible electric arising from steady conduction current, Phys. Rev. D 14, 922, 1976. |
| [13] | Roser W.G.V. Second-Order Electric Field due to a Conducting Curent. American Journal of Physics, 1962, v. 30, №7, p. 509-511. |
| [14] | Don A. Baker. Second-Order Electric Field due to a Conducting Curent. American Journal of Physics, 1964, v.32, № 2, p. 153-157. |
| [15] | Mende F. F. Great misconceptions and errors physicists XIX-XX centuries. Revolution in modern physics, Kharkоv NTMT, 2010. |
| [16] | Mende F. F. New electrodynamics. Revolution in the modern physics. NTMT, 2012. |
| [17] | Mende F. F. Electric pulse space of a thermonuclear explosion, Engineering Physics, №5, 2013, p. 16-24. |
