Indexing
All Issues
Submission
Author Guidelines
Reviewers
Editorial Members
Publication Fee
Vol.3 , No. 2, Publication Date: Oct. 28, 2020, Page: 8-14
 adhere to accepted conventions, there are times when both parties can be seen to undertake breathtaking divergence from those norms, turning their divergences into an art form. For its part and not seeking to pick a pocket or two, this paper reveals that the English determination to maximise operational flexibility drives it to <i>Repackage</i> — at all grammatical levels. These are syntactic (sentences), morphemic (words), phonemic (letters) and morphophonemic (word with attached letter) levels. Repackage is defined as giving its structures multiple uses. Because repackaging has remained undetected for so long, it would seem to infer an almost hidden subtlety of English. The methodology used herein is to provide an across-the-board suite of uncluttered exemplar sentences, which cover all grammatical levels. These exemplars are accompanied by inline explanatory commentary which is intended to fully inform ESL Teachers about the <i>nature</i> of English. But English is not secretive. The exemplars show that the <i>nature</i> of English was always hidden in plain sight, awaiting recognition and identification.&picture=http://www.aascit.org/aascit/decorators/img/journal/932.jpg)
| [1] | Dennis Michael Bryant, Faculty of Arts, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia. |
This paper is the first and only successful attempt at identifying and illustrating clearly the underlying nature of English. The thesis presented herein is that English is obsessive in its thrust to sacrifice conventional constraints in order to maximize its operational flexibility. Operational flexibility is defined as a modest set of procedures that enables speakers of English to facilitate their communications, with ease. In other words, blind adherence to societal or grammatical constraints is not congruent to the nature of English. In fact, English operates in a manner not unlike the Artful Dodger character in Dicken’s Oliver Twist novel. While both parties (the Dodger and English) adhere to accepted conventions, there are times when both parties can be seen to undertake breathtaking divergence from those norms, turning their divergences into an art form. For its part and not seeking to pick a pocket or two, this paper reveals that the English determination to maximise operational flexibility drives it to Repackage — at all grammatical levels. These are syntactic (sentences), morphemic (words), phonemic (letters) and morphophonemic (word with attached letter) levels. Repackage is defined as giving its structures multiple uses. Because repackaging has remained undetected for so long, it would seem to infer an almost hidden subtlety of English. The methodology used herein is to provide an across-the-board suite of uncluttered exemplar sentences, which cover all grammatical levels. These exemplars are accompanied by inline explanatory commentary which is intended to fully inform ESL Teachers about the nature of English. But English is not secretive. The exemplars show that the nature of English was always hidden in plain sight, awaiting recognition and identification.
Keywords
English Grammar, ESL Educational Practice, ESL Curriculum Redevelopment, ESL Teaching, Second Language Acquisition
Reference
| [01] | Wrenn, C. L. (1949). The English Language. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd. |
| [02] | Hamby, B. (2015). Willingness to Inquire: The Cardinal Critical Thinking Virtue. In M. Davies &. R. Barnett (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education (pp. 77-88). New York: Palgrave MacMillan. |
| [03] | I. Vardi. (2015). The relationship between Self-Regulation, Personal Epistimology, and Becoming a “Critical Thinker”: Implications for Pedagogy. In M. Davies &. R. Barnett (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education (pp. 197-212). New York: Palgrave MacMillan. |
| [04] | Sapir, E. (1929). The Status of Linguistics as a Science. Language, 5 (4), 207-214. |
| [05] | Sapir, E. (1921). Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc. |
| [06] | Torres-Gouzerh, R. (2019). Practice Makes Perfect: Intermediate English Grammar. (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education. |
| [07] | Swick, E. (2009). Verbs and Essentials of Grammar for ESL Learners. New York: McGraw-Hill. |
| [08] | Langacker, R. W. (1973). Language and its Structure: some fundamental linguistic concepts (2nd ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovic, Inc. |
| [09] | Bolinger, D. (1968). Aspects of Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc. |
| [10] | Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. New York: Harper & Row. |
| [11] | Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Mouton: The Hague. |
| [12] | Mitchell, A. G. (1962). The Use of English. Sydney: Angus & Robertson. |
| [13] | Potter, S. (1950). Our Language (2nd. ed.). Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Books. |
| [14] | Mitchell, B. (1995). An Invitation to Old English and Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd. |
| [15] | D. Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of General Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. |
| [16] | O'Connor, J. D. (1973). Phonetics. Language & Linguistics. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books. |
| [17] | Greenberg, J. H. (1973). Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of Language (pp. 73-113). London: MIT Press. |
| [18] | Bryant, D. M. (2019a). Focussing on Promotion in English Sentences to inform ESL Educational Practice, Language, Literature and Culture. 2 (3), 108-113. Extracted from http://www.aascit.org/journal/archive?journalId=932. |
| [19] | Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. New York: Longman. ISBN: 0-582-36816-2. |
| [20] | Christison, M. A. (2002). Multiple intelligences and language learning: A guidebook of theory, activities, inventories, and resources. Burlingame, CA: Alta Book Center. ISBN: 1-882483-75-3. |
| [21] | Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. New York: Longman. ISBN: 0-582-30588-8. |
| [22] | Dornyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation. New York: Longman. ISBN: 0-582-38238-6. |
| [23] | Bryant, D. M. (2019b). Focussing on Building up ESL Perception of Verb Slot Complexity to inform Educational Practice. Language, Literature and Culture, Vol. 2, No. 3, 133-138. Extracted from http://www.aascit.org/journal/archive?journalId=932. |
| [24] | Bryant, D. M. (2019c). Focussing on Decoding Contractions in English Sentences to Inform ESL Educational Practice. International Journal of Culture and History. 6 (2), 90-101 Extracted from https://doi.org/10.5296/ijch.v6i2. Paper also available at http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijch/article/view/15892 |
| [25] | Bruner, J. (1978). The role of dialogue in language acquisition. In A. Sinclair, R., J. Jarvelle, and W. J. M. Levelt (eds.) The Child's Concept of Language. New York: Springer-Verlag. |
| [26] | Bryant, D. M. (2020). The Form and the Function that Defines and Associates Definite and Indefinite Articles in English Grammar. International Journal of Culture and History. Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 30-40. Paper is also available at http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijch/article/view/17213. |
