ISSN: 2375-3773
International Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources  
Manuscript Information
 
 
Economics of NTFPs for the Ethnic Minority Livelihood: The Case of “Peuak Meuak” in Northern Laos
International Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources
Vol.1 , No. 1, Publication Date: Jul. 7, 2014, Page: 13-23
1931 Views Since July 7, 2014, 974 Downloads Since Apr. 14, 2015
 
 
Authors
 
[1]    

Latsamy Phounvisouk, Department of Development and Management, College of Humanities and Development, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.

[2]    

Zuo Ting, Department of Development and Management, College of Humanities and Development, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.

 
Abstract
 

Peuak Meuak (Boehmeria malabarica), is a source of income for collectors and a growing number of ethnic minority households in Luang Namtha province. It is collected from the forest and also cultivated as a domestic plant and is one of the most significant NTFP exports from northern Laos. Because of the development of roads and bridges in the region, mobility of NTFP traders have greatly improved in tandem with the rapidly growing economy of China. The main aims of this study are (1) to study the potential of “peuak meuak” in poverty alleviation and sustainable rural development under conditions of increased resource scarcity in northern Laos, (2) to study the socio-economic impacts for growers and collectors, (3) to identify the steps in the supply chain of “peuak meuak” and (4) to provide a general view of the “peuak meuak” industry in northern Laos. This study showed that the supply mechanism is reliant upon specific ethnic minority relations as well as different forms of capital that together sustain economic advantages for particular players. Rising demand in China provides sound income opportunities for all actors in the “peuak meuak” supply chain. Growing improved varieties has become a boon for farmers endowed with relatively large land areas with suitable agro-ecological conditions. However, land-poor and landless collectors of wild “peuak meuak” are facing increasing difficulties due to overharvesting, lower prices offered by middlemen, and the rapid conversion of remaining forests into monoculture plantations, especially rubber, which has reduced the natural habitat of “peuak meuak” and other non timber forest products. Currently, farmers increase production of “peuak meuak” through cultivation of “peuak meuak” on plantations under the rubber and teak trees as well as reducing soil erosion and bringing improving land productivity. Due to fast economic changes in Laos, some critical gaps have emerged concerning the sustainability of wild “peuak meuak” and their domestication. Much information is required to enable local users to improve harvesting techniques, and help them in making decisions regarding management and marketing of “peuak meuak”.


Keywords
 

Northern Laos, NTFPs, Peuak Meuak, Supply Chain, Ethnic Minority Livelihoods, Poverty Alleviation


Reference
 
[01]    

ADB (2001). Participatory poverty assessment: Lao PDR. Asian Development Bank, Vientiane

[02]    

Cohen PT (2009). The post-opium scenario and rubber in northern Laos: alternative Western and Chinese models of development. Int J Drug Policy 20(5):424–430

[03]    

DOIN (2007). Forest Law/Article 9. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Vientiane

[04]    

Foppes, J and Phommasane, S (2005). Workshop on Market Information Systems (MIS) for Agriculture and Forestry Products, July 5-6, Santi Resort, Luang Prabang Province. NAFRI/FRC, SNV, FAO, LSUARFP, Lux Development. Draft Summary Report, 26 p.

[05]    

Friederichsen, R and Neef A (2010). Variations of late socialist development: integration and marginalization in the northern uplands of Vietnam and Laos. Eur J Dev Res 22(4):564–581

[06]    

GTZ (2003). Towards Sustainable Rural Livelihoods in Northern Laos. Report of a mission to Luang Namtha province, Laos PDR, 46 p.

[07]    

IUCN (2001). The international seminar on Non-timber forest product. China Yunnan; Laos; Vietnam, IUCN.

[08]    

IUCN (2005). The focusing on wildlife trade in Lao PDR and Vietnam, Traffic Southeast Asia, Malaysia

[09]    

Lestrelin G (2010). Land degradation in Lao PDR: discourses and policy. Land Use Policy 27(2):424–439

[10]    

Latsamy P, Zuo T, and Ng Chee Kiat (2013). Non-Timber Forest Products Marketing: Trading Network of trader and Market Chain in Luang Namtha Province, Lao PDR

[11]    

MAF and STEA (2003). National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF) and Science, Technology and Environment Agency (STEA) Lao PDR.

[12]    

NAFRI (2004). Summary report from a workshop on Poverty Reduction and Shifting Cultivation Stabilization in the Upland of Lao PDR, held in Luangprabang, January 27-30, 2004. National Agriculture and Forestry research Institute. Vientiane, Laos.

[13]    

NAFRI D et al (2007). Non-timber forest products in the Lao PDR. A manual of 100 commercial and traditional products. National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute (NAFRI), National University of Laos and Service (NUoL) and Netherlands Development Organization (SNV), Vientiane

[14]    

NAFRI and CIAT (2010). Starting an Agro-Enterprise Development Process in the Lao PDR

[15]    

Neef A, Suebpongsang P, Manythong C, Tacheena W, and Ogata K (2010) Can paper mulberry contribute to building sustainable rural livelihoods in northern Laos? Southeast Asian Stud 47(4):403–425

[16]    

Raintree JB, and Soydara V (2001). Human ecology and rural livelihoods. United Nations Development Program (UNDP), Vientiane

[17]    

Thongmanivong S, and Fujita Y (2006). Recent land use and livelihood transitions in northern Laos. Mount Res Dev 26(3):237–244

[18]    

WFP (2007). Lao PDR: comprehensive food security and vulnerability analysis (CFSVA). WFP, Rome.





 
  Join Us
 
  Join as Reviewer
 
  Join Editorial Board
 
share:
 
 
Submission
 
 
Membership