Indexing
All Issues
Submission
Author Guidelines
Reviewers
Editorial Members
Publication Fee
Vol.3 , No. 1, Publication Date: Jan. 12, 2016, Page: 1-5
 for Fundamentals of Programming Students&description=Training people through tutoring system is one factor why there are continuous threads running through this research which define its essential and distinctive nature. Specifically, tutoring systems are computer-based learning structures which attempt to adapt to the needs of learners and are therefore the only systems which attempt to 'care' about learners in that sense. This paper presents findings on how effective the tutoring system on program logic formulation as a supportive measure of students’ capacity of learning logical design. Findings of the study support the educational aspect of learning via computer structures to explain further concepts and applications not totally learned during lecture hours. The researcher proposes to implement in the IT PLF with the use of SCORM Learning Objects with RELOAD editor software and supported by an open source LMS to improve the portability of digital resource and improve the content assimilation in students. Expecting enhancement of structuring the student understanding of a programming language.&picture=http://www.aascit.org/aascit/decorators/img/journal/914.jpg)
| [1] | Iluminada Vivien R. Domingo, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Polytechnic University of the Philippines, Sta. Mesa, Manila. |
Training people through tutoring system is one factor why there are continuous threads running through this research which define its essential and distinctive nature. Specifically, tutoring systems are computer-based learning structures which attempt to adapt to the needs of learners and are therefore the only systems which attempt to 'care' about learners in that sense. This paper presents findings on how effective the tutoring system on program logic formulation as a supportive measure of students’ capacity of learning logical design. Findings of the study support the educational aspect of learning via computer structures to explain further concepts and applications not totally learned during lecture hours. The researcher proposes to implement in the IT PLF with the use of SCORM Learning Objects with RELOAD editor software and supported by an open source LMS to improve the portability of digital resource and improve the content assimilation in students. Expecting enhancement of structuring the student understanding of a programming language.
Keywords
Natural Language Processing, Lexical Analyzer, Machine Translation, Lexical Analyzer
Reference
| [01] | Anderson, Cognitive modeling and intelligent tutoring, Advanced Computer Tutoring Project, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Journal of Computing Education, 2010; 86(2); 41-51. |
| [02] | Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2000). Limitations of student control: Do students know when they need help? In G. Gauthier, C. Frasson & K. VanLehn (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring systems: 5th International Conference, ITS 2010 (pp. 292-303). |
| [03] | Beck, J., Stern, M., & Haugsjaa, E. (2006). Applications of AI in Education. ACM Crossroads, 3.1. |
| [04] | Berlin: Springer. Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (2005). Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 167-207. |
| [05] | Bloom, B. S. (2014). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-toone tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13, 4-16. |
| [06] | Bulitko, V. V., & Wilkins, D. C. (2009). Automated instructor assistant for ship damage control. In Proceedings of AAAI-99. Carberry, S. (1990). Plan Recognition in Natural Language Dialogue. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. |
| [07] | Burton, Richard and Brown, John, Tutoring systems at Work, Journal of Information Technology and Sciences, 2008; 36(2); 20-25. |
| [08] | Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). E-learning and the Science of Instruction. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley |
| [09] | Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (2009). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 15, 145-182. |
| [10] | Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (2009). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.) Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 543-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. |
| [11] | Conati, Cristina, Intelligent Tutoring systems: New Challenges and Directions Department of Computer Science University of British Columbia (2012). |
| [12] | Corbett, A., Koedinger, K. R., & Anderson, J. R. (2007). Intelligent Tutoring systems. In M. Helander, T. K. Landauer & P. Prahu (Eds.) Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, Second Edition (pp. 849-874). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. |
| [13] | Croteau, E. A., Heffernan, N. T., & Koedinger, K. R. (2004). Why are algebra word problems difficult? Using tutorial log files and the power law of learning to select the best fitting cognitive model. In J. C. Lester, R. M. Vicari & F. Paraguaçu (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring systems: 7th International Conference, ITS 2014 (pp. 240-250). |
| [14] | Deden, Christopher, A review and synthesis of recent research in intelligent computer-assisted instruction, Direct Education Journal, 2012, (3) |
| [15] | Graesser, A. C., Lu, S., Jackson, G. T., Mitchell, H. H., Ventura, M., Olney, A., et al. (2014). AutoTutor: A tutor with dialogue in natural language. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 36, 180-193. |
| [16] | Graesser, A. C., Moreno, K., Marineau, J., Adcock, A., Olney, A., & Person, N. (2013). Auto Tutor improves deep learning of computer literacy: Is it the dialog or the talking head? In U. Hoppe, F. Verdejo & J. Kay (Eds.) Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 47-54). Amsterdam: IOS. |
| [17] | Graesser, A. C., Lu, S., Jackson, G. T., Mitchell, H. H., Ventura, M., Olney, A., et al. (2014). Auto Tutor: A tutor with dialogue in natural language. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 36, 180-193. |
| [18] | Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Mark, M. A., & Greer, J. (2013). Evaluation methodologies for intelligent tutoring systems. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 4(2/3), 129-153. Martin, B., & Mitrovic, A. (2002). Automatic problem generation in constraint-based tutors. In S. A. Cerri, G. Gouardères & F. Paraguaçu (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring systems: 6th International Conference, ITS 2002 (pp. 388-398). |
| [19] | Jickel, J., & Johnson, W. L. (2009). Animated agents for procedural training in virtual reality: Perception, Cognition, and Motor Control. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 13, 343-382. |
| [20] | Jameson, A. (2005). Numerical uncertainty management in user and student modeling: An overview of systems and issues. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interactions, 5(3/4), 193-251. 4. |
| [21] | Jesús Miguel García Gorrostieta1 , Samuel González López2 , Aurelio López-López 2013, Results of a Case Study of an Intelligent Tutoring system for Analyzing Student Projects Presented as Research Papers. |
| [22] | Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J. H. (2010). Speech and Language Processing: An introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics and Speech Recognition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Katz, S., Connelly, J., & Allbritton, D. (2003). Going beyond the problem given: How human tutors use postsolution discussions to support transfer. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13, 79-116. |
| [23] | Katz, S., Lesgold, A., Hughes, E., Peters, D., Eggan, G., Gordin, M., et al. (2008). Sherlock 2: An intelligent 02 tutoring system built on the LRDC framework. In C. P. Bloom & R. B. Loftin (Eds.) Facilitating the development and use of interactive learning environments (pp. 227-258). |
| [24] | Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (2006). The effects of feedback intervention on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 254-284. |
| [25] | Koedinger, K. R., Anderson, J. R., Hadley, W. H., & Mark, M. A. (2007). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8(1), 30-43. Lesgold, A. (1994). Assessment of intelligent training technology. In E. L. Baker & H. F. O'Neil (Eds.) Technology Assessment in Education and Training (pp. 97-116). |
| [26] | Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Macmillan, S. A., Emme, D., & Berkowitz, M. (2008). Instructional Planners: Lessons Learned. In J. Psotka, L. E. Massey & S. A. Mutter (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring systems: Lessons Learned (pp. 229-256). |
| [27] | Mitrovic, A., & Ohlsson, S. (2009). Evaluation of a constraint-based tutor for a database language. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 238-256. Murray, C., VanLehn, K., & Peachy, D. R., & McCalla, G. I. (2006). Using planning techniques in intelligent tutoring systems. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 24, 77-98. Person, N., Graesser, A. C., Bautista, L., Mathews, E. C., & TRG. (2001). Evaluating student learning gains in two versions of AutoTutor. In J. D. Moore, C. Redfield & W. L. Johnson (Eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education: AI-ED in the Wired and Wireless future (pp. 268-293). Amsterdam: IOS. |
| [28] | Rickel, J., & Johnson, W. L. (2009). Animated agents for procedural training in virtual reality: Perception, Cognition, and Motor Control. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 13, 343-382. |
| [29] | Self, John, Computer Based Learning Unit, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (IJAIED), 2008, 10(31), 350-364. |
| [30] | Swatrz, Merryanna, Intelligent Tutoring systems for Foreign Language Learning: The Bridge to International Communication, Asian Journal of Educational Technology, 2009; 45(3); 65-72. |
| [31] | Webb, L., Lindonl, J., Stiles, R., & Munro, A. (2012). Integrating pedagogical agents into virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(6), 523-546. |
