ISSN: 2375-3838
International Journal of Clinical Medicine Research  
Manuscript Information
 
 
Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness Changes After Internal Limiting Membran Peeling for Macular Hole Treatment
International Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
Vol.3 , No. 6, Publication Date: Feb. 8, 2017, Page: 89-94
1670 Views Since July 29, 2016, 646 Downloads Since Jul. 29, 2016
 
 
Authors
 
[1]    

Ibrahim Kocak, Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.

[2]    

Haci Koc, Retina Department, Inci Eye Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey.

[3]    

Hakan Baybora, Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.

[4]    

Faruk Kaya, Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.

[5]    

Ali Aydin, Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.

 
Abstract
 

This article’s aim is to evaluate macular retinal ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness changes after Brilliant Blue G (BBG)-assisted internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for idiopathic macular hole treatment. Fifteen eyes of fifteen patients who underwent pars plana vitrectomy with ILM peeling were included in the study. Other eyes of the patients were included in the study as control group. BBG assisted ILM peeling performed in 15 eyes. Baseline and, postoperative 3rd, 6th, and 12th months’ BCVA and GCIPL thicknesses were recorded. In the operation group, BCVA improvement (1.06±0.22 to 0.43±0.29 logMar, p=0.0037), inferotemporal and superotemporal GCIPL thickness decrease after surgery (76±2.3 to 65±4.84, p=0.0044, and 73±7.6 to 63±3.82 mµ, p=0.0166, respectively) were statistically significant. In the control group, there was no postoperative statistically significant change. Superotemporal and inferotemporal GCIPL thinning and BCVA improvement in operated eyes showed statistically significant difference comparing to control eyes (p=0.0128, p=0.0024, p=0.0029 respectively). ILM peeling causes retinal morphological changes like irregularities and indentations on the inner surface of the retina, thickening of the nasal retina, temporal GCIPL thinning, and dissociated optic nerve fiber layer during the late postoperative period. GCIPL thinning, particularly in the temporal region, is a common finding after ILM peeling. This may be related to toxic effects of ILM dyes and mechanical trauma.


Keywords
 

Ganglion Cell Inner Plexiform Layer, Internal Limiting Membrane, Macular Hole


Reference
 
[01]    

McCannel CA, Ensminger JL, Diehl NN, Hodge DN. Population-based incidence of macular holes. Ophthalmology 2009; 116 (9): 1366-9.

[02]    

Allen CH, Guyer DR, Fine SL. Macular hole: major review. Survey of Ophthalmology 1998; 42 (5): 393-416.

[03]    

Christensen UC, Krøyer K, Sander B, Larsen M, Henning V, Villumsen J. Value of internal limiting membrane peeling in surgery for idiopathic macular hole stage 2 and 3: a randomised clinical trial. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2009; 93 (8): 1005-15.

[04]    

R. Tadayoni, M. Paques, P. Massin, S. Mouki-Benani, J. Mikol, and A. Gaudric, Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance of the fundus after idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal,” Ophthalmology 2001; 108 (12): 2279–2283.

[05]    

Baba T, Yamamoto S, Kimoto R, Oshitari T, Sato E. Reduction of thickness of ganglion cell complex after internal limiting membrane peeling during vitrectomy for idiopathic macular hole. Eye (2012) 26, 1173–1180.

[06]    

Sabater AL, Velázquez-Villoria Á, Zapata MA, et al. "Evaluation of macular retinal ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness after vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic macular holes." BioMed research international 2014; 1-8. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/458631

[07]    

J. Sebag, “The vitreous,” in Adler’s Physiology of the Eye, W. M. Hart, Ed., pp. 268–347, Mosby-YearBook, Baltimore, Md, USA, 9th edition, 1992.

[08]    

E. C. La Heij, S. C. Dieudonn´e, C. M. Mooy et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of the internal limiting membrane peeled with infracyanine green. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2005; 140 (6): 1123–1125.

[09]    

B. S. Fine, Limiting membranes of the sensory retina andpigment epithelium. An electron microscopic study. Archives of Ophthalmology 1961; 66: 847–860.

[10]    

H.-S. Yoon, H. L. Brooks Jr., A. Capone, N. L. L’Hernault, and H. E. Grossniklaus, Ultrastructural features of tissue removedduring idiopathic macular hole surgery. American Journal of Ophthalmology 1996; 122 (1): 67–75.

[11]    

G. Wollensak, E. Spoerl, G. Grosse, and C. Wirbelauer. Biomechanical significance of the human internal limiting lamina. Retina 2006; 26 (8): 965–968.

[12]    

G. Wollensak and E. Spoerl. Biomechanical characteristics of retina. Retina 2004; 24 (6): 967–970.

[13]    

F. Kuhn, R. Morris, C. D. Witherspoon, and V. Mester. Tersonsyndrome: results of vitrectomy and the significance of vitreoushemorrhage in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Ophthalmology 1998; 105 (3): 472–477.

[14]    

R. Morris, F. Kuhn, C. D. Witherspoon, V. Mester, and J. Dooner. Hemorrhagic macular cysts in Terson’s syndrome and its implications for macular surgery. Developments in Ophthalmology 1997; 29: 44–54.

[15]    

V. Mester and F. Kuhn. Internal limiting membrane removalin the management of full-thickness macular holes. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2000; 129 (6): 769–777.

[16]    

Semeraro F, Morescalchi F, Duse S, Gambicorti E, Russo A, Costagliola C. Current Trends about Inner Limiting Membrane Peeling in Surgery for Epiretinal Membranes. Journal of Ophthalmology 2015; Article ID 671905, 13 pages, http: //dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/671905.

[17]    

L. Ternent, L. Vale, C. Boachie, J. M. Burr, and N. Lois. Cost effectiveness of internal limiting membrane peeling versus nopeeling for patients with an idiopathic full-thickness macularhole: results froma randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2012; 96 (3): 438–443.

[18]    

N. Lois, J. Burr, J. Norrie et al. Internal limiting membranepeeling versus no peeling for idiopathic full-thickness macularhole: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2011; 52 (3): 1586–1592.

[19]    

Seo KH, Yu SY, Kwak HW. Topographic changes in macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness after vitrectomy with indocyanine green-guided internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic macular hole. Retina. 2015; 35 (9): 1828-35. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000563.

[20]    

Balaiya S, Brar VS, RK, ChalamKV. Effects of Indocyanine green on cultured retinal ganglion cells in-vitro. BMC Research Notes 2009; 2: 236doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-2-236.

[21]    

Evaluation of Macular Retinal Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness after Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Idiopathic Macular Holes. BioMed Research International 2014; Article ID 458631. doi: 10.1155/2014/458631.

[22]    

Ooi YL, Khang TF, Naidu M, Fong KCS. The structural effect of intravitreal Brilliant blue G and Indocyanine green in rats eyes. Eye 2013; 27: 425–431; doi: 10.1038/eye.2012.260.

[23]    

Ambiya V, Goud A, Khodani M, Chhablani J. Inner retinal thinning after Brilliant Blue G-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling for vitreoretinal interface disorders. International Ophthalmology 2016; Online first: 1-8.

[24]    

R. Tadayoni, Paques M, Massin P, Mouki-Benani S, Mikol J, Gaudric A. Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance of the fundus after idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal. Ophthalmology 2001; 108 (1): 22279–2283.





 
  Join Us
 
  Join as Reviewer
 
  Join Editorial Board
 
share:
 
 
Submission
 
 
Membership