About Communications       Author's Guide       Reviewers       Editorial Members       Archive
Archive
Volume 8
2021
Volume 7
2020
Volume 6
2019
Volume 5
2018
Volume 4
2017
Volume 3
2016
Volume 2
2015
Volume 1
2014
AASCIT Communications | Volume 3, Issue 5 | Sep. 13, 2016 online | Page:231-239
Public Governance and Management as per Human Resource, Accountability and Environment According to Composite Supportive Progress (CASP)
Abstract
Sustainable Development is an innovative concept symbolized as Composite Appraising Supportive Progress (CASP). Biodiversity concept is an extra key topic having huge influence on public governance and management. Procedures designing composite progressive indicators manage actions with defined methodology. Dutch categories are prescribed as per Ministerial, Statistic and Geographic implementations. The resulting sequence is represented as: Genes, Society (S), Human Resource Organization and Management (HROM); Species, Economy (E), Public Accountable Governance (PAG); Ecosystems, Nature (N), Global Environmental Change (GEC); Functions, CASP, Public Governance and Management (PGM). The current paper is a proposal to organize Dutch CASP within biodiversity concept. Composite Progressive Indicators (CPI) are proceeded for methodologies, results, actualization and discussions on three (3) magnitudes of Dutch CASP. Dutch CASP categories are applied through Dutch statistic themes; associated with existing governmental ministries of the Netherlands; allocated in 12 Dutch provinces; distributed in four (4) Utrecht University positions within the biodiversity concept; categorized as per themes according to departmental announcements; executed equivalence of subjectivity within categories; and proposed the model through the combination of eighteen (18) categories of CASP. Further deeper research is required to aptly assess biodiversity concept within Dutch CASP.
Authors
[1]
Azniv Felix Petrosyan, Department of Geography & Regional Planning, School of Rural & Surveying Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Zographou Campus, Athens, Greece; Independent Researcher of Armenia, Zeytun, Yerevan, Armenia.
Keywords
Public Governance & Management (PGM), Human Resource Management (HROM), Public Accountable Governance (PAG), Global Environmental Change (GEC), Bio-diverse Sustainable Development (BSD), Composite Progressive Indicators (CPI)
Reference
[1]
Petrosyan Azniv (2014), Appraising Biodiversity in Supportive Progress Using GIS Means, LAP LAMBERT, Academic Publishing Company in Saarbrucken, Germany, ISBN: 978-3-659-34415-2, 668 pp.
[2]
Petrosyan, A. F., (2010). A Model for Incorporated Measurement of Sustainable Development Comprising Remote Sensing Data and Using the Concept of Biodiversity. Journal of Sustainable Development 3 (2): 9-26.
[3]
Petrosyan, A. F., (2005). Economic valuation of biodiversity loss: the case of Mediterranean forest. Participation on the sixth meeting of the “Développementd” Actions pour le Marketing et al Gestion post-évènements’’- DAMAGE. Athens, Greece, October.
[4]
Lyytimaki, J., Rosenstrom, U., (2008). Skeletons out of the closet: effectiveness of conceptual frameworks for communicating sustainable development indicators. Sustainable Development 16 (5): 301-313.
[5]
Levett, R., (1998). Sustainability indicators—integrating quality of life and environmental protection. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 161 (3): 291-302.
[6]
Walton JS, El-Haram M, Castillo NH, Horner RMW, Price ADF, Hardcastle C., (2005). Integrated assessment of urban sustainability. Engineering Sustainability 158 (2): 57–65.
[7]
Azniv Felix Petrosyan, (2015a). PhD, “Smart Development Through Biodiversity Concept in Armenian Composite Appraising Supportive Progress (ACASP)”, International Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, American Association for Science and Technology (AASCIT); 1 (4): 64-77, Published online 30.08.2015, (http://www.aascit.org/journal/ijbim)
[8]
Azniv F. Petrosyan, (2015b). PhD, “Indicative Review Through Biodiversity Concept in Construction of Composite Appraising Supportive Progress (CASP) of Armenia”, American Journal of Environmental Policy and Management, American Association for Science and Tech (AASCIT); 1 (4): 57-66, Published online 30.08.2015; (http://www.aascit.org/journal/ajepm)
[9]
Azniv Felix Petrosyan, (2015c). PhD, “Approximation of Indicators in Society Magnitude as per Armenian Composite Appraising Supportive Progress (ACASP)”, International Journal of Investment Management and Financial Innovations, American Association for Science & Tech (AASCIT); 1 (4): 77-88; Published online 30.08.2015 (http://www.aascit.org/journal/ijimfi)
[10]
Azniv Petrosyan, (2015d). PhD, “Procedures Designing Composite Progressive Indicators”, International Journal of Econometrics and Financial Management, Science and Education Publishing 3 (2): 104-109. http://pubs.sciepub.com/ijefm/3/2/8/
[11]
Wikipedia (2016). The Netherlands. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Website available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands
[12]
Statweb (2016). Statistics of the Netherlands. Online statistic data. Website available at: http://statline.cbs.nl/Statweb/
[13]
Nijkamp, P., Vreeker, R., (2000). Sustainability assessment of development scenarios: methodology and application to Thailand. Ecological Economics 33 (1): 7-27.
Arcticle History
Submitted: Aug. 18, 2016
Accepted: Aug. 30, 2016
Published: Sep. 13, 2016
The American Association for Science and Technology (AASCIT) is a not-for-profit association
of scientists from all over the world dedicated to advancing the knowledge of science and technology and its related disciplines, fostering the interchange of ideas and information among investigators.
©Copyright 2013 -- 2019 American Association for Science and Technology. All Rights Reserved.